Maybe this was based on a true story, or the author didnt think that it was necessary to add names.
i think the author didnt give names because, it makes you to read until the end because you might think the names will be somewhere in the ending.
Maybe to give the story a different affect. Or he couldnt think of any names that really fit the charachters discription.
maybe to give the idea that nothing that had meaning before the cataclysm (like names) holds significance after?
He believes that names are not important in life, no sense of identity.
to make the novel much important that the characters in it. To make the noval more important.
Probably because the most important thing in the book is the relationship between the father and son and also its the end of the world and they are trying to find safety and civilization their names are not very important.
Maybe this was based on a true story, or the author didnt think that it was necessary to add names.
ReplyDeletei think the author didnt give names because, it makes you to read until the end because you might think the names will be somewhere in the ending.
ReplyDeleteMaybe to give the story a different affect. Or he couldnt think of any names that really fit the charachters discription.
ReplyDeletemaybe to give the idea that nothing that had meaning before the cataclysm (like names) holds significance after?
ReplyDeleteHe believes that names are not important in life, no sense of identity.
ReplyDeleteto make the novel much important that the characters in it. To make the noval more important.
ReplyDeleteProbably because the most important thing in the book is the relationship between the father and son and also its the end of the world and they are trying to find safety and civilization their names are not very important.
ReplyDelete